Dear readers:
Welcome to my blog. I don’t update often, but I try to put something down on this blog every once in a while. Today I am going to give you a very brief summary of what I have done this summer, and then write a draft essay for my brother to correct so that I can improve my writing.
This summer I have had opportunities to perform chamber music with my string trio. We are an unnamed group consisting of a violist named Ben, a cellist named Chloe, and a violinist named Tim (that’s me). In July we gave a presentation to a Ucla summer class on chamber music. Also, we are preparing music to be played in the fall. By getting a heads start, we hope to be more prepared for performance opportunities when school starts.
In addition to chamber music, I also taught at a summer camp for CPYO, a youth symphony in northern California. There is a violin teacher whom I studied with who conducts a group in Saratoga. I did a fair amount of conducting and gave string sectionals. Adopting a “just do it” mentality, I had to take on the role of a teacher in front of a large group of students that were strangers to me. Yet it all worked out well. Students liked me, I enjoyed teaching, and the staff appreciated the work I did.
Below is the first practice essay. You may leave comments if you find some gross error.
“People often complain that products are not made to last. They feel that making products that wear out fairly quickly wastes both natural and human resources. What they fail to see, however, is that such manufacturing practices keep costs down for the consumer and stimulate demand.”
Which do you find more compelling, the complaint about products that do not last or the response to it? Explain your position, using relevant reasons and/or examples from your own experience, observations, or reading.”
Products that can be used for the long term reduce waste because less product must be produced over a longer period of time. For example, a good shovel, a dependable car, or a quality pair of boots can last many years. On the other hand, short term products are fitting for industries whose products are constantly changing. For example, new versions of mp3 players and cameras are released often, rendering old models obsolete. Computers are upgraded and become more powerful to meet the demands of new software. Making such products to last for a very long time is unnecessary because consumers typically buy new versions every few years. It is reasonable for such firms to make products last for the short-term because their products will not be used for long.
It is true that such products can be very wasteful-especially if they are disposed of carelessly. However, if recycled properly, products can take a new form, and there material can be reused, greatly reducing the consumption of natural resources. A wide array of short-term products can be recycled: there are places to recycle computers, old clothes, cell phones, and batteries. Companies using recycled materials are common, evidenced by writing on their products.
For those that complain that “short term” is a waste of resources, I would argue that the product is not a waste if it satisfies the demands of consumers and stimulates the economy. Common sense tells me that companies who make vastly inferior products will be driven out of the market, or be forced to stop producing such products if there is no demand for them. But if consumers buy such goods, they feed money to the firms who produce the products. Firms in turn pay their workers, who then pump money to other firms for different products. Short term products are not a waste of human resources in the sense that they create more jobs and more money for people to spend.
In the final analysis, waste of natural resources, while certain, can be greatly reduced through recycling material. It is the responsibility of consumers to dispose of their products correctly, and of companies to utilize recycled materials. Human resources are not wasted from short-term products, as the business generated from the creation of such goods stimulates the economy.